[ad_1]
I have been speaking with a really sharp chief about how that particular person makes use of the concepts of threat and technical debt. I am paraphrasing, however the chief stated one thing like this: “We notice we have to incur some technical debt. So we clarify that we select to incorporate the debt as a part of our threat mitigation.
That is a bottom-up description of what I believe happens day by day when folks and groups tackle technical debt. We notice we are able to mitigate a threat by taking up technical debt. Then we current that mitigation as a approach to handle dangers.
As an alternative, I like to consider threat administration first. Once we begin with the varied dangers, and use the Rule of Three to create choices and options, we would not have to tackle technical debt.
I am utilizing technical debt within the sense that we all know we have to do extra. However for time or different causes, we select to take a shortcut. We notice the mortgage cost may balloon for that debt. However given our present state of threat, we select the choice of debt. (See Technical Debt, Loans & Costs.)
If we do not begin with dangers and we do not create extra choices, we would tackle debt we needn’t.
Should you, too, try to handle dangers by taking up technical debt, ask these questions on this order:
- What dangers do I see?
- What number of choices can I create for mitigating these dangers?
- What are the present advantages and foreseeable prices (the debt concepts) for selecting a type of choices?
We won’t at all times keep away from technical debt, however we regularly have extra choices than we first discover. It is worthwhile contemplating these different choices to handle threat.
Associated
[ad_2]
